Skip to content
Political Tracker

4 July 2024 · 1:06 PM · Division 8

Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering Better Financial Outcomes and Other Measures) Bill 2024

Second Reading - Local content quotas
Official title
Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering Better Financial Outcomes and Other Measures) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Local content quotas

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
14
No
36
Not recorded voting
26

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). This means the amendment failed. It was introduced by the Australian Greens.

Amendment text

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:

(a) notes that the Government promised to implement local content quotas on streaming giants by 1 July 2024, but it is yet to introduce any legislation, breaking this promise; and

(b) calls on the Government to support Australia's screen sector and prioritise the introduction of its legislative reforms for local content quotas to protect and promote Australian stories and jobs".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
14
No
36
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party220
Liberal Party013
Australian Greens90
Independent10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
National Party01
Senate President01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 14

No · 36

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.