Skip to content
Political Tracker

4 July 2024 · 1:38 PM · Division 16

Communications Legislation Amendment (Prominence and Anti-Siphoning) Bill 2024

Official title
Communications Legislation Amendment (Prominence and Anti-Siphoning) Bill 2024 - Comittee of the Whole - Codes of practice for broadcasting video on demand services

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
14
No
28
Not recorded voting
34

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment introduced by ACT Senator David Pocock (Independent), which means it failed.

Amendment text

(1)—Clause 2, page 2 (at the end of the table), add:

4. Schedule 3

The day after the end of the period of 18 months beginning on the day this Act receives the Royal Assent.

(2)—Page 36 (after line 2), at the end of the bill, add:

Schedule 3 — Codes of practice for broadcasting video on demand services

Broadcasting Services Act 1992

1 Subsection 123(1)

Omit "radio and television industry", substitute "radio, television, and other relevant broadcasting industry".

2 After paragraph 123(1)(e)

Insert:

and (f) providers of broadcasting video on demand services;

3 At the end of section 123

Add:

(8) For the purposes of this section:

broadcasting video on demand service has the same meaning as in Part 9E.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
14
No
28
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party218
Australian Greens90
Liberal Party15
National Party02
Independent10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Senate President01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party01
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 14

No · 28

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.