Skip to content
Political Tracker

6 Feb 2025 · 12:36 PM · Division 3

Scams Prevention Framework Bill 2024

Second Reading - Criticism of Government
Official title
Scams Prevention Framework Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Criticism of Government

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
59
No
76
Not recorded voting
14

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against the amendment to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for reading the bill for a second time). This means the usual second reading motion will remain unchanged.

Motion text

That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: "whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes the Government's:

(1) rushed, half-finished and last-minute approach to legislating its scams prevention policy; and

(2) failure to control homegrown inflation and address the cost of living crisis;

is leaving Australians more vulnerable to scams".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
58
No
76
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party074
Liberal Party340
National Party110
Independent52
Liberal National Party70
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 58

No · 76

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.