Skip to content
Political Tracker

11 Feb 2025 · 1:31 PM · Division 1

Administrative Review Tribunal (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2024

in Committee - Timeframe for applications for review
Official title
Administrative Review Tribunal (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2024 - in Committee - Timeframe for applications for review

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
38
No
30
Not recorded voting
8

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of amendment (4) on sheet GF100, which means it will now be included in the bill.

Queensland Senator Anthony Chisholm (Labor) explained that these amendments:

extend the timeframe for persons who are in immigration detention to apply to the tribunal for a review of migration and protection decisions from seven days to 14 days. This would ensure that no applicants in immigration detention have less time to apply than they did in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.

Amendment text

(4) Schedule 2, items 115 to 119, page 35 (line 18) to page 37 (line 2), omit the items, substitute:

115 Paragraph 347(3)(a)

Omit “7 days”, substitute “14 days”.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
38
No
30
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party230
Liberal Party020
Australian Greens100
National Party04
Independent20
Liberal National Party02
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party02
Australia's Voice10
Country Liberal Party01
Deputy Senate President01
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Senate President10

How each member voted

Aye · 38

No · 30

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.