Skip to content
Political Tracker

12 Feb 2025 · 6:50 PM · Division 21

Scams Prevention Framework Bill 2025

Second Reading - Reimbursement and jurisdiction
Official title
Scams Prevention Framework Bill 2025 - Second Reading - Reimbursement and jurisdiction

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
14
No
29
Not recorded voting
33

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against amendments introduced by Tasmanian Senator Nick McKim (Greens), which means it failed. It would have added the text below to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).

Amendment text

SHEET 3294

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:

(a) notes that:

(i) too many people and their families experience significant harm from scams each year,

(ii) instead of implementing a best practice model to prevent scams, Labor has caved to the interests of the major banks and their multi-billion-dollar profits, and

(iii) under Labor's bill, it would take a person impacted by a scam up to 30 steps and 2 years to seek redress, and at the end of the process there is no guarantee they will get any of their money back; and

(b) calls on the Government to amend the bill to include a presumption of reimbursement, similar to the UK model, which would require banks to promptly reimburse people who have been scammed, and then recover costs from other businesses involved in the scam in proportion to their liability, including telcos and digital platforms".

SHEET 3324

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:

(a) notes that:

(i) the bill fails to address the jurisdictional impediments to enforcement of laws against offshore social media companies,

(ii) any measures or civil penalties the bill imposes on online platforms will be unenforceable and require voluntary compliance,

(ii) the Joint Select Committee on Social Media and Australian Society considered the impact of online scams and jurisdictional impediments and recommended that the Australian Government consider options for greater enforceability of Australian laws for social media platforms, including amending regulation and legislation, to effectively bring digital platforms under Australian jurisdiction; and

(b) calls on the Government to urgently act to bring digital platforms under Australian jurisdiction and ensure jurisdiction is not an impediment to enforcement measures in the bill".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
14
No
29
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party221
Australian Greens80
Liberal Party05
Independent20
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party02
Australia's Voice10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Senate President01

How each member voted

Aye · 14

No · 29

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.