Skip to content
Political Tracker

12 Feb 2025 · 6:54 PM · Division 22

Scams Prevention Framework Bill 2025

Second Reading - Reimbursement
Official title
Scams Prevention Framework Bill 2025 - Second Reading - Reimbursement

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
18
No
26
Not recorded voting
32

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment introduced by Queensland Senator Pauline Hanson (One Nation), which means it failed. It would have added the text below to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).

Amendment text

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:

(a) notes that this legislation fails to make adequate provisions for the compensation of vulnerable Australians who have been victims of scams; and

(b) calls on the Government to introduce legislation similar to the successful UK model of reimbursement, which ensures that banks are required to initially refund scam victims, providing stronger consumer protection and accountability in the financial sector".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
18
No
26
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party221
Australian Greens90
Liberal Party14
Independent20
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party20
Australia's Voice10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Senate President01

How each member voted

Aye · 18

No · 26

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.