Skip to content
Political Tracker

12 Feb 2025 · 7:22 PM · Division 29

Oversight Legislation Amendment (Robodebt Royal Commission Response and Other Measures) Bill 2024

Second Reading - Transparency and implement recommendations
Official title
Oversight Legislation Amendment (Robodebt Royal Commission Response and Other Measures) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Transparency and implement recommendations

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
13
No
24
Not recorded voting
39

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against an amendment introduced by the Australian Greens, which means it failed. This amendment would have added the text below to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).

Amendment text

At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:

(a) notes that:

(i) Robodebt was the worst failure of public administration in Australian history, raising an estimated $1.73 billion of illegitimate debts from over 430,000 vulnerable Australians,

(ii) there is widespread community outrage due to a lack of accountability and insufficient findings from completed investigations; and

(iii) the Robodebt scheme flourished because of a political and media culture that stigmatises income support recipients, and failures in public sector leadership and culture in key departments; and

(b) calls on the Albanese Government to:

(i) implement all 57 recommendations of the Robodebt Royal Commission in full to ensure that Robodebt can never happen again,

(ii) immediately release the confidential additional chapter of the Robodebt Royal Commission report,

(iii) provide the Parliament with an update regarding the status of any civil or criminal referrals made in connection with Robodebt,

(iv) reinstate the six-year limitation on debt recovery as a matter of urgency,

(v) abolish the punitive Work for the Dole and the Targeted Compliance Framework, that have propagated a culture of punishing income support recipients; and

(vi) ensure that the lessons for public sector leadership, management, culture and policy are learned by incorporating study of this failed chapter across public sector leadership education and development training".

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
13
No
24
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party220
Australian Greens90
Liberal Party02
Australia's Voice10
Independent10
National Party01
Senate President01

How each member voted

Aye · 13

No · 24

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.