Skip to content
Political Tracker

27 Aug 2025 · 4:00 PM · Division 7

Australian Army: Jervis Bay Incident

Order for the Production of Documents
Official title
Documents — Australian Army: Jervis Bay Incident; Order for the Production of Documents

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
17
No
30
Not recorded voting
28

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The official title above is the most reliable description of the question.

Text recorded with this division

Sue Lines

I will now move to general business notice of motions No. 114 and 115.

Lisa Darmanin

I seek to have these have treated separately.

Sue Lines

Sure. Senator Roberts, would you move 114 first and then 115.

Malcolm Roberts

I move:

That there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Attorney-General, by no later than 5 pm on Friday, 29 August 2025, in relation to the deaths of four soldiers in the 2023 Whitsundays Taipan helicopter crash:

(a) the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions' (CDPP) final assessment of the brief of evidence provided by Comcare; and

(b) all written or digital correspondence, briefing notes, file notes, meeting notes, meeting agendas or minutes or other records of interaction held by the CDPP or the Attorney-General in relation to the decision not to commence a prosecution.

Anthony Chisholm

I seek leave to make a short statement.

Sue Lines

Leave is granted for one minute.

Anthony Chisholm

We recognise the tragic loss of the MRH-90 aircrew on 28 July 2023. We remember the lives, dedication and spirit of Captain Danniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class 2 Joseph 'Phillip' Laycock and Corporal Alexander Naggs. The documents requested by this order go directly to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions's decision-making about whether a matter is to be prosecuted or not.

This concerns the release of potential legal advice prepared by the CDPP. A decision to prosecute a matter is one that lies with the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions which is an independent statutory agency. As has been widely reported, the families have requested a review into this decision, and it would not be appropriate to require the CDPP to release this information. I understand another OPD related to this matter will be supported by the government.

Sue Lines

The question is that general business notice of motion No. 114, standing in the name of Senator Roberts, be agreed to.

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
17
No
30
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party122
Australian Greens100
Liberal Party06
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party30
Australia's Voice10
Independent10
Liberal National Party01
Senate President01
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 17

No · 30

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.