Skip to content
Political Tracker

3 Sept 2025 · 5:10 PM · Division 9

Finance and Public Administration References Committee

Reference
Official title
Committees — Finance and Public Administration References Committee; Reference

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
25
No
29
Not recorded voting
21

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The official title above is the most reliable description of the question.

Text recorded with this division

Fatima Payman

I move:

That the following matter be referred to the Finance and Public Administration References Committee for inquiry and report by 27 October 2025:

The development of a fair and independent staffing model for allocating personal staff that reflects the diversity of representation, as elected by the Australian people, and addresses staff wellbeing and sustainability of workload.

Anthony Chisholm

I seek leave to make a short statement.

Sue Lines

Leave is granted for one minute.

Anthony Chisholm

The government will be opposing this motion. We've been through this before. The Independent Review of Resourcing in Parliamentarian Offices was an independent review, handled independently. The final report of this review was released on 1 August. The government has already agreed in principle to all 10 recommendations and will work with all parliamentarians on our response and reform. I know that the Special Minister of State is, as always, available to engage with those acting in good faith on this issue.

Larissa Waters

I seek leave to make a short statement.

Sue Lines

Leave is granted for one minute.

Larissa Waters

We welcomed the Senate's support earlier today for my amendment that called on the government to work with all elected groups and individuals in the parliament to develop a fair and independent staffing model for allocating personal staff that reflects the diversity of representation as elected by the Australian people and addresses staff wellbeing and sustainability of workload. The right way to do that is not to send this matter to a Liberal-controlled Senate committee.

Politicians' pay and entitlements aren't decided by a Senate committee, and staffing levels and welfare shouldn't be either. The independent PWSS ran a review of staff resourcing and supports earlier this year, and 500 staff participated in that review. The review made 10 key recommendations, and I'm pleased that the government has committed to implementing those. The Greens will be focused on ensuring that that does in fact occur. I've written to the Special Minister of State asking for a timetable for implementing the Independent Review of Resourcing in Parliamentarian Offices and asking for PWSS to take note of our second reading amendment on staff wellbeing.

Paul Scarr

I seek leave to make a very short statement.

Hon. Senators

Honourable senators interjecting—

Paul Scarr

No, I'm supporting it, but I just want to answer one of the points.

Sue Lines

Well, it's not a debating point, Senator Scarr. The question is that business of the Senate notice of motion No. 1 standing in the name of Senator Payman be agreed to.

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
25
No
29
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party119
Liberal Party120
Australian Greens09
Independent20
Liberal National Party20
National Party20
Australia's Voice10
Country Liberal Party10
Deputy Senate President10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Senate President01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 25

No · 29

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.