Skip to content
Political Tracker

3 Sept 2025 · 5:20 PM · Division 10

Parliament House: Sponsored Access

Order for the Production of Documents
Official title
Documents — Parliament House: Sponsored Access; Order for the Production of Documents

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
16
No
30
Not recorded voting
29

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The official title above is the most reliable description of the question.

Text recorded with this division

Fatima Payman

I move:

That there be laid on the table by the President of the Senate, by no later than 5 pm on Friday, 12 September 2025, a document listing all current holders of sponsored Australian Parliament House access cards, including the name of the sponsor and the organisation the passholder represents, but not the name of the passholder.

Anthony Chisholm

I seek leave to make a short statement.

Sue Lines

Leave is granted for one minute.

Anthony Chisholm

As a matter of principle, the government does not support orders for the production of documents being directed to the President. Unlike a minister or an agency of executive government, the President represents the whole Senate. In this instance, the document sought would be a matter of joint parliamentary administration shared with the Speaker of the House of Representatives. It is not appropriate for the Senate to order a production of material by the President over which the President does not have unilateral control and it is offensive to the principles of camaraderie between the houses to act in such a way. The matter raised by Senator Payman has been extensively canvassed in recent years, including in an inquiry by the Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee, which reported just last year.

Sue Lines

The question is that general business notice of motion No. 149, standing in the name of Senator Payman, be agreed to.

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
16
No
30
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party119
Australian Greens90
Liberal Party08
Independent20
Australia's Voice10
Jacqui Lambie Network10
Liberal National Party01
National Party01
Senate President01
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10
United Australia Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 16

No · 30

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.