Skip to content
Political Tracker

4 Sept 2025 · 1:16 PM · Division 14

Home Affairs Legislation Amendment (2025 Measures No. 1) Bill 2025

Limitation of Debate - Pass the bill
Official title
Home Affairs Legislation Amendment (2025 Measures No. 1) Bill 2025 - Limitation of Debate - Pass the bill

Ayes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
30
No
12
Not recorded voting
33

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted in favour of a motion that the remaining stages of the bill be agreed to and the bill be now passed. In other words, they voted to pass the bill in the Senate. Because the bill was already passed in the House of Representatives, it will now become law.

What does this bill do?

According to the preliminary bills digest, which is a document prepared by the parliamentary library:

The Home Affairs Legislation Amendment (2025 Measures No. 1) Bill 2025 (the Bill) amends the Migration Act 1958 with regard to provisions introduced by two Acts passed in late 2024 principally concerning the removal of certain non-citizens from Australia under ‘third country reception arrangements’.

‘Natural justice’, often used synonymously with ‘procedural fairness’, affords a person certain procedural rights in relation to decisions made, or actions taken, that affect that person’s rights or interests.

Currently under the Migration Act, rules of natural justice do not apply to a range of actions including certain visa cancellations. The Bill specifies additional provisions where the rules of natural justice will not apply. These are:

  • in relation to third country reception arrangements
  • certain decisions made regarding the collection, use and disclosure of information, including criminal history information and
  • ministerial directions given to removal pathway non-citizens.

Additionally, the Bill validates relevant visa decisions made prior to NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] HCA 37.

Noting responses to the previous legislation, stakeholders are likely to raise significant objections to the present Bill on the grounds of human rights concerns.

At the time of writing, the Bill had not been referred to or reported on by any parliamentary committees.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
30
No
12
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party230
Australian Greens010
Liberal Party30
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party30
Australia's Voice01
Independent01
Senate President10

How each member voted

Aye · 30

No · 12

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.