Skip to content
Political Tracker

8 Oct 2025 · 12:03 PM · Division 3

Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Triple Zero Custodian and Emergency Calling Powers) Bill 2025

Official title
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Triple Zero Custodian and Emergency Calling Powers) Bill 2025 - Consideration in Detail - Rural, regional and remote Australians

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
44
No
86
Not recorded voting
20

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against amendments introduced by Mallee MP Anne Webster (Nationals), which means they failed.

Ms Webster explained that:

These amendments ensure that the Triple Zero Custodian is reporting to the government and the parliament on the specific connectivity issues that rural, regional and remote Australians are facing.

Amendment text

(1) Schedule 1, item 7, page 5 (line 33), at the end of subsection 151A(2), add:

; (c) the deficiencies in connectivity in rural, regional and remote Australia that put Australians living there at risk from ECS outage events.

(2) Schedule 1, item 7, page 16 (after line 16), after paragraph 151Q(1)(b), insert:

(ba) the specific challenges and personal safety risks faced by Australians living in rural, regional and remote areas through poor connectivity to emergency call services;

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
44
No
86
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party086
Liberal Party150
Independent90
Liberal National Party90
National Party70
Australian Greens10
Centre Alliance10
Katter's Australian Party10
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party10

How each member voted

Aye · 44

No · 86

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.