Skip to content
Political Tracker

20 Jan 2026 · 10:56 PM · Division 21

Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Criminal and Migration Laws) Bill 2026

Official title
Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Criminal and Migration Laws) Bill 2026 - Limitation of Debate - Protected political speech and purpose and application of Act

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
12
No
43
Not recorded voting
21

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

The majority voted against amendments on sheet 3588 and sheet 3590 circulated by Victorian Senator Lidia Thorpe (Independent) and moved by WA Senator Fatima Payman (Australia's Voice), which means they failed.

Amendment text

Sheet 3588

(1) Schedule 2, item 4, page 45 (after line 19), after note 1, insert:

Note 1A: As per the judgement of the Federal Court in Wertheim v Haddad [2025] FCA 720, criticism of the practices, policies, and acts of the state of Israel, the Israeli Defence Force or Zionism is not inherently criticism of Jewish people and is protected political speech, not hate speech.

(2) Schedule 2, item 7, page 47 (after line 19), after note 1, insert:

Note 1A: As per the judgement of the Federal Court in Wertheim v Haddad [2025] FCA 720, criticism of the practices, policies, and acts of the state of Israel, the Israeli Defence Force or Zionism is not inherently criticism of Jewish people and is protected political speech, not hate speech.

(3) Schedule 2, item 10, page 49 (after line 17), after note 1, insert:

Note 1A: As per the judgement of the Federal Court in Wertheim v Haddad [2025] FCA 720, criticism of the practices, policies, and acts of the state of Israel, the Israeli Defence Force or Zionism is not inherently criticism of Jewish people and is protected political speech, not hate speech.

Sheet 3590

4 General provisions about the purpose and application of this Act

(1) The purpose of this Bill to provide protections from vilification for people experiencing systemic injustice and structural oppression, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

(2) Nothing in this Act is intended to limit or threaten the ability of people to engage in protected political expression as protected by Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights done at New York on 16 December 1966.

(3) Nothing in this Act is intended to limit or threaten the self‑determination of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, as protected by:

(a) Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights done at New York on 16 December 1966; and

(b) Article 1 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights done at New York on 16 December 1966; and

(c) the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 13 September 2007.

(4) As per the judgement of the Federal Court in Wertheim v Haddad [2025] FCA 720, criticism of the practices, policies, and acts of the state of Israel, the Israeli Defence Force or Zionism is not inherently criticism of Jewish people and is protected political speech, not hate speech.

Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate

Policies this vote counts towards

How They Vote For You uses this vote when scoring members against each policy.

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
12
No
43
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party127
Australian Greens100
Liberal Party010
National Party03
Australia's Voice10
Liberal National Party01
Senate President01
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 12

No · 43

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.