Skip to content
Political Tracker

4 Feb 2026 · 4:52 PM · Division 16

Grok Chatbot

Order for the Production of Documents
Official title
Documents — Grok Chatbot; Order for the Production of Documents

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
22
No
37
Not recorded voting
17

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The official title above is the most reliable description of the question.

Text recorded with this division

Fatima Payman

I move:

That there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Minister for Communications, by no later than 5 pm on Thursday, 19 February 2026, copies of all ministerial submissions, records of conversation, letters, briefing notes, meeting agendas, file notes, meeting invitations, meeting notes, meeting minutes, emails and instant/electronic messages between the Minister for Communications and/or her office, the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts and the Office of the eSafety Commissioner in relation to:

(a) the recent usage of the artificial intelligence chatbot Grok by users on X (formerly Twitter) to create non-consensual sexual imagery; and

(b) the development of any potential response, legislative or otherwise, to the use of Grok in this way.

Katy Gallagher

by leave—I move:

Omit all words after "That", insert:

(a) orders for the production of documents is one of the Senate's most serious powers, and should be used when other processes have been exhausted rather than for fishing expeditions;

(b) senators seeking to order the production of documents should consider paragraph (a) and refine their orders accordingly; and

(c) notes that Senator Payman has been offered multiple briefings by the Minister for Communications on various topics related to online safety and the senator has declined these offers.

Sue Lines

The question is that the amendment as moved by Minister Gallagher to general business notice of motion No. 323 be agreed to.

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
22
No
37
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party211
Liberal Party017
Australian Greens09
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party03
Independent02
Liberal National Party02
Australia's Voice01
Country Liberal Party01
Senate President10
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 22

No · 37

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.