Skip to content
Political Tracker

2 Mar 2026 · 5:02 PM · Division 13

Australian Public Service

Order for the Production of Documents
Official title
Documents — Australian Public Service; Order for the Production of Documents

Noes in the majority

This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.

Aye
23
No
38
Not recorded voting
15

“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.

What was decided

No plain-English summary has been written for this division yet. The official title above is the most reliable description of the question.

Text recorded with this division

David Pocock

I move:

That the Senate—

(a) notes that on 26 November 2025, the Senate agreed to order for the production of documents no. 288 (the order), requiring the Minister for Finance and Minister representing the Treasurer, and the Minister representing the Prime Minister, to table specified correspondence concerning cost-saving targets by 28 November 2025;

(b) notes that the response provided by the minister relies on a claim of Cabinet confidentiality and public interest immunity;

(c) notes that, as set out in Odgers' Australian Senate Practice, a claim of Cabinet confidentiality relates only to disclosure that would reveal the actual deliberations of Cabinet, and that a claim cannot be sustained merely because a document has a connection to Cabinet processes;

(d) notes that the Government has neither established that disclosure of the documents sought would reveal Cabinet deliberations nor specified the harm that would occur if they were released;

(e) rejects the claim of public interest immunity made in response to the order; and

(f) orders that the documents specified in the order be laid on the table by 9 am on Wednesday, 4 March 2026, or, if any documents are withheld, that the minister table a statement identifying:

(i) the specific document withheld, and

(ii) how disclosure of that document would reveal Cabinet deliberations and specify the harm that would occur if the document was released.

Anthony Chisholm

by leave—I move:

Omit paragraphs (c) to (f), substitute:

(c) the Minister for Finance has previously advised the Senate that "the idea that we are imposing a 5% cut on agencies is incorrect".

Sue Lines

The question is that the amendment as moved by Senator Chisholm to general business notice of motion No. 336, standing in the name of Senator David Pocock, be agreed to.

The question is that general business notice of motion No. 336 standing in the name of Senator David Pocock be agreed to.

This is the question as put in the chamber, with the name of the member who spoke before the vote. It isn't a summary of the bill or motion.

See this division on They Vote For You

Votes by party

Both bars use the same scale: number of members.
Aye
23
No
38
Votes by party as a table
PartyAyeNo
Australian Labor Party221
Liberal Party015
Australian Greens09
National Party03
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party03
Liberal National Party02
Australia's Voice01
Country Liberal Party01
Deputy Senate President01
Independent01
Senate President10
United Australia Party01

How each member voted

Aye · 23

No · 38

Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.