Maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding
People who support this policy believe that the federal government should maintain or increase the amount of funding allocated to the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).
View on They Vote For You →How each party's members voted
Each bar is 100% of a party's current members in the House of Representatives whom They Vote For You places in one of its seven agreement groups for this policy (its own categories, shown as published). Bars show percentages of members, not vote totals; the number beside each bar is how many members that is. Members They Vote For You says haven't cast enough votes on the policy are counted separately, not in the bars.
- Consistently against
- Almost always against
- Generally against
- Mixture
- Generally for
- Almost always for
- Consistently for
One Nation0 members+1 not enough votes
Party breakdown as a table (number of members in each group)
| Party | Consistently against | Almost always against | Generally against | Mixture | Generally for | Almost always for | Consistently for | Not enough votes | Members in bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One Nation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
All 1 members, by agreement
| Member | Party | Position | Agreement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barnaby Joyce (New England) | One Nation | Not enough votes to say | 8% |
Votes that make up this policy
The policy position on each vote. Strong votes count more towards a member's agreement score.
- 1 Sept 2014 · SenatePolicy: AyeMotions - Australian Animal Health Laboratory - Fund CSIRO
- 14 Feb 2008 · SenatePolicy: AyeMotions - Climate Change - Reverse decision to cut funding
- 9 Feb 2006 · SenatePolicy: AyeMotions - Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation - Renewable energy