Independent reviews of significant legal changes
People who support this policy believe that when a bill makes a significant change to existing law, the federal government should make sure the bill includes a provision that requires an independent review to take place after a defined period to ensure that the new regime is operating as intended.
View on They Vote For You →How each party's members voted
Each bar is 100% of a party's current members in the House of Representatives whom They Vote For You places in one of its seven agreement groups for this policy (its own categories, shown as published). Bars show percentages of members, not vote totals; the number beside each bar is how many members that is. Members They Vote For You says haven't cast enough votes on the policy are counted separately, not in the bars.
- Consistently against
- Almost always against
- Generally against
- Mixture
- Generally for
- Almost always for
- Consistently for
No current members of this chamber have voted on this policy.
All 0 members, by agreement
| Member | Party | Position | Agreement |
|---|
Votes that make up this policy
The policy position on each vote. Strong votes count more towards a member's agreement score.
- 15 June 2020 · SenatePolicy: AyeMigration Amendment (Regulation of Migration Agents) Bill 2019 and another - in Committee - Independent review
- 26 Feb 2020 · SenatePolicy: AyeSocial Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Simplifying Income Reporting and Other Measures) Bill 2020 - in Committee - Review
- 5 Dec 2019 · SenatePolicy: AyeAustralian Crime Commission Amendment (Special Operations and Special Investigations) Bill 2019 - Third Reading - Statutory review