Skip to content
Political Tracker

Senate electoral reform

People who support this policy believe that the federal government should change the laws governing Senate elections to allow voters more direct control over the flow of preferences, whether they vote above or below the line.

View on They Vote For You →

How each party's members voted

Each bar is 100% of a party's current members in the House of Representatives whom They Vote For You places in one of its seven agreement groups for this policy (its own categories, shown as published). Bars show percentages of members, not vote totals; the number beside each bar is how many members that is. Members They Vote For You says haven't cast enough votes on the policy are counted separately, not in the bars.

  • Consistently against
  • Almost always against
  • Generally against
  • Mixture
  • Generally for
  • Almost always for
  • Consistently for
Labor
28 members
Liberal
9 members
Nationals
4 members
One Nation
1 member
Independent
1 member
Katter's Australian
1 member
Party breakdown as a table (number of members in each group)
PartyConsistently againstAlmost always againstGenerally againstMixtureGenerally forAlmost always forConsistently forNot enough votesMembers in bar
Labor120160000028
Liberal000000909
Nationals000000404
One Nation000000101
Independent000010001
Katter's Australian001000001
All 44 members, by agreement
MemberPartyPositionAgreement
Alex Hawke (Mitchell)LiberalVoted consistently for100%
Darren Chester (Gippsland)NationalsVoted consistently for100%
Dan Tehan (Wannon)LiberalVoted consistently for100%
Michael McCormack (Riverina)NationalsVoted consistently for100%
Scott Buchholz (Wright)LiberalVoted consistently for100%
Tony Pasin (Barker)LiberalVoted consistently for100%
Michelle Landry (Capricornia)NationalsVoted consistently for100%
Melissa Price (Durack)LiberalVoted consistently for100%
Angus Taylor (Hume)LiberalVoted consistently for100%
Jason Wood (La Trobe)LiberalVoted consistently for100%
Rick Wilson (O'Connor)LiberalVoted consistently for100%
Kevin Hogan (Page)NationalsVoted consistently for100%
Andrew Hastie (Canning)LiberalVoted consistently for100%
Barnaby Joyce (New England)One NationVoted consistently for100%
Andrew Wilkie (Clark)IndependentVoted generally for75%
Jason Clare (Blaxland)LaborVoted generally against25%
Julie Collins (Franklin)LaborVoted generally against25%
Mark Dreyfus (Isaacs)LaborVoted generally against25%
Justine Elliot (Richmond)LaborVoted generally against25%
Catherine King (Ballarat)LaborVoted generally against25%
Richard Marles (Corio)LaborVoted generally against25%
Tanya Plibersek (Sydney)LaborVoted generally against25%
Tony Zappia (Makin)LaborVoted generally against25%
Rob Mitchell (McEwen)LaborVoted generally against25%
Chris Bowen (McMahon)LaborVoted generally against25%
Lisa Chesters (Bendigo)LaborVoted generally against25%
Clare O'Neil (Hotham)LaborVoted generally against25%
Matt Thistlethwaite (Kingsford Smith)LaborVoted generally against25%
Jim Chalmers (Rankin)LaborVoted generally against25%
Andrew Leigh (Fenner)LaborVoted generally against25%
Bob Katter (Kennedy)Katter's AustralianVoted generally against25%
Mark Butler (Hindmarsh)LaborVoted generally against25%
Anthony Albanese (Grayndler)LaborVoted consistently against0%
Tony Burke (Watson)LaborVoted consistently against0%
Shayne Neumann (Blair)LaborVoted consistently against0%
Amanda Rishworth (Kingston)LaborVoted consistently against0%
Ed Husic (Chifley)LaborVoted consistently against0%
Michelle Rowland (Greenway)LaborVoted consistently against0%
Tim Watts (Gellibrand)LaborVoted consistently against0%
Joanne Ryan (Lalor)LaborVoted consistently against0%
Sharon Claydon (Newcastle)LaborVoted consistently against0%
Andrew Giles (Scullin)LaborVoted consistently against0%
Pat Conroy (Shortland)LaborVoted consistently against0%
Anne Urquhart (Braddon)LaborVoted consistently against0%

Votes that make up this policy

The policy position on each vote. Strong votes count more towards a member's agreement score.