8 Nov 2016 · 7:24 PM · Division 2
Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2016
- Official title
- Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2016 - Second Reading - Agree to the bill's main idea
Ayes in the majority
This says only which side won the vote, because what Aye and No meant here depends on the exact question put in the chamber.
- Aye
- 45
- No
- 9
- Not recorded voting
- 21
“Not recorded voting” is everyone eligible who isn't recorded as Aye or No, for example absent, paired, or presiding.
What was decided
The majority voted to support the main idea of the bill's main idea. In parliamentary jargon, they voted against giving the bill a second reading.
This means that the Senate can now discuss the bill in more detail.
What is the bill's main idea?
According to the bills digest, the bill:
is the latest in a series of reforms to national security and counter-terrorism laws since mid-2014. The Government states the Bill would address issues that have come to light through recent counter-terrorism investigations and operational activity.
A key part of the bill relates to control orders. For example, the bill would lower the minimum age that a control order can be imposed from 16 to 14 years of age. It would also introduce new ‘monitoring powers’ to:
allow police to use entry, search and seizure, telecommunications interception and surveillance device powers in relation to a person subject to a control order to monitor their compliance with the order and prevent terrorist related conduct
A concerning part of the bill relates to procedural fairness and will:
allow courts to consider information that is not disclosed to the person subject to a control order or their representative for security reasons, in control order proceedings ... and introduce a system of special advocates to represent the interests of those people in proceedings from which they and their legal representatives have been excluded ...
Summary written by They Vote For You contributors. Read it with the debate
Policies this vote counts towards
- Preventative Detention Orders (PDOs)Supporters vote Aye
- Increasing surveillance powersSupporters vote Aye · counts strongly
- More scrutiny of intelligence services & policeSupporters vote No · counts strongly
Votes by party
Votes by party as a table
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Labor Party | 20 | 0 |
| Liberal Party | 13 | 0 |
| Australian Greens | 0 | 8 |
| National Party | 3 | 0 |
| Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party | 3 | 0 |
| Nick Xenophon Team | 2 | 0 |
| Country Liberal Party | 1 | 0 |
| Derryn Hinch's Justice Party | 1 | 0 |
| Independent | 1 | 0 |
| Jacqui Lambie Network | 1 | 0 |
| Liberal Democratic Party | 0 | 1 |
How each member voted
Aye · 45
- Catryna BilykTasmania · Labor
- Doug CameronNSW · Labor
- Kim CarrVictoria · Labor
- Anthony ChisholmQueensland · Labor
- Patrick DodsonWA · Labor
- Don FarrellSA · Labor
- Alex GallacherSA · Labor
- Katy GallagherACT · Labor
- Chris KetterQueensland · Labor
- Kimberley KitchingVictoria · Labor
- Gavin MarshallVictoria · Labor
- Jenny McAllisterNSW · Labor
- Malarndirri McCarthyNT · Labor
- Claire MooreQueensland · Labor
- Helen PolleyTasmania · Labor
- Louise PrattWA · Labor
- Glenn SterleWA · Labor
- Anne UrquhartBraddon · Labor
- Murray WattQueensland · Labor
- Penny WongSA · Labor
- Nigel ScullionNT · CLP
- Derryn HinchVictoria · Derryn Hinch's Justice
- Nick XenophonSA · Independent
- Jacqui LambieTasmania · Jacqui Lambie Network
- Christopher BackWA · Liberal
- David BushbyTasmania · Liberal
- Michaelia CashWA · Liberal
- Jonathon DuniamTasmania · Liberal
- David FawcettSA · Liberal
- Concetta Fierravanti-WellsNSW · Liberal
No · 9
- Richard Di NataleVictoria · Greens
- Sarah Hanson-YoungSA · Greens
- Nick McKimTasmania · Greens
- Lee RhiannonNSW · Greens
- Janet RiceVictoria · Greens
- Rachel SiewertWA · Greens
- Larissa WatersQueensland · Greens
- Peter Whish-WilsonTasmania · Greens
- David LeyonhjelmNSW · Liberal Democrats
Spotted a mistake? Report a correction.