Giving approval for mining in the Liverpool Plains
People who support this policy believe that the federal government should give approval for new mines in the Liverpool Plains, such as the Shenhua Watermark coal mine.
View on They Vote For You →How each party's members voted
Each bar is 100% of a party's current members in the House of Representatives whom They Vote For You places in one of its seven agreement groups for this policy (its own categories, shown as published). Bars show percentages of members, not vote totals; the number beside each bar is how many members that is. Members They Vote For You says haven't cast enough votes on the policy are counted separately, not in the bars.
- Consistently against
- Almost always against
- Generally against
- Mixture
- Generally for
- Almost always for
- Consistently for
Labor
1 member
Party breakdown as a table (number of members in each group)
| Party | Consistently against | Almost always against | Generally against | Mixture | Generally for | Almost always for | Consistently for | Not enough votes | Members in bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
All 1 members, by agreement
| Member | Party | Position | Agreement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Urquhart (Braddon) | Labor | Voted consistently for | 100% |
Votes that make up this policy
The policy position on each vote. Strong votes count more towards a member's agreement score.
- 15 Nov 2017 · SenatePolicy: NoMotions - Coal Seam Gas Mining: Liverpool Plains - Moratorium
- 10 Nov 2015 · SenatePolicy: NoBusiness - Coalmining - Oppose Shenhua Watermark coal mine
- 3 Mar 2015 · SenatePolicy: NoMotions — Liverpool Plains