Extended Supervision Orders (ESOs)
People who support this policy believe that the federal government should introduce Extended Supervision Orders (ESOs) that impose conditions on a person who has been convicted of certain terrorist offences and subsequently released, if the court is satisfied that there is an unacceptable risk that the person will commit certain serious terrorism offences in the community.
View on They Vote For You →How each party's members voted
Each bar is 100% of a party's current members in the House of Representatives whom They Vote For You places in one of its seven agreement groups for this policy (its own categories, shown as published). Bars show percentages of members, not vote totals; the number beside each bar is how many members that is. Members They Vote For You says haven't cast enough votes on the policy are counted separately, not in the bars.
- Consistently against
- Almost always against
- Generally against
- Mixture
- Generally for
- Almost always for
- Consistently for
Party breakdown as a table (number of members in each group)
| Party | Consistently against | Almost always against | Generally against | Mixture | Generally for | Almost always for | Consistently for | Not enough votes | Members in bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Labor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
All 2 members, by agreement
| Member | Party | Position | Agreement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ben Small (Forrest) | Liberal | Voted consistently for | 100% |
| Anne Urquhart (Braddon) | Labor | Voted consistently for | 100% |
Votes that make up this policy
The policy position on each vote. Strong votes count more towards a member's agreement score.
- 22 Nov 2021 · SenatePolicy: Aye (strong)Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (High Risk Terrorist Offenders) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea