Skip to content
Political Tracker

Extending government benefits to same-sex couples

People who support this policy believe that the federal government should extend any financial and work-related entitlements and benefits that currently only apply to heterosexual couples to same-sex couples and their children.

View on They Vote For You →

How each party's members voted

Each bar is 100% of a party's current members in the Senate whom They Vote For You places in one of its seven agreement groups for this policy (its own categories, shown as published). Bars show percentages of members, not vote totals; the number beside each bar is how many members that is. Members They Vote For You says haven't cast enough votes on the policy are counted separately, not in the bars.

  • Consistently against
  • Almost always against
  • Generally against
  • Mixture
  • Generally for
  • Almost always for
  • Consistently for
Labor
4 members+1 not enough votes
Liberal
1 member+1 not enough votes
Greens
0 members+1 not enough votes
Party breakdown as a table (number of members in each group)
PartyConsistently againstAlmost always againstGenerally againstMixtureGenerally forAlmost always forConsistently forNot enough votesMembers in bar
Labor000003114
Liberal100000011
Greens000000010
All 8 members, by agreement
MemberPartyPositionAgreement
Sarah Hanson-Young (SA)GreensNot enough votes to say100%
Helen Polley (Tasmania)LaborVoted consistently for99%
Penny Wong (SA)LaborVoted almost always for95%
Carol Brown (Tasmania)LaborVoted almost always for88%
Glenn Sterle (WA)LaborVoted almost always for88%
Michaelia Cash (WA)LiberalNot enough votes to say0%
Don Farrell (SA)LaborNot enough votes to say0%
Richard Colbeck (Tasmania)LiberalVoted consistently against0%

Votes that make up this policy

The policy position on each vote. Strong votes count more towards a member's agreement score.