Capping electoral spending
People who support this policy believe that the federal government should put caps on how much candidates can spend during their electoral campaigns.
View on They Vote For You →How each party's members voted
Each bar is 100% of a party's current members in the Senate whom They Vote For You places in one of its seven agreement groups for this policy (its own categories, shown as published). Bars show percentages of members, not vote totals; the number beside each bar is how many members that is. Members They Vote For You says haven't cast enough votes on the policy are counted separately, not in the bars.
- Consistently against
- Almost always against
- Generally against
- Mixture
- Generally for
- Almost always for
- Consistently for
No current members of this chamber have voted on this policy.
All 0 members, by agreement
| Member | Party | Position | Agreement |
|---|
Votes that make up this policy
The policy position on each vote. Strong votes count more towards a member's agreement score.
- 12 Feb 2025 · SenatePolicy: AyeElectoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea
- 12 Feb 2025 · SenatePolicy: AyeElectoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Bill 2024 - Third Reading - Pass the bill
- 20 Nov 2024 · HousePolicy: AyeElectoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Bill 2024 - Report from Federation Chamber - Agree with the bill's main idea
- 20 Nov 2024 · HousePolicy: AyeElectoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Bill 2024 - Report from Federation Chamber - Agree with the bill
- 20 Nov 2024 · HousePolicy: AyeElectoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Bill 2024 - Third Reading - Pass the bill