Banning all investment in cluster munitions
People who support this policy believe that the federal government should ban both direct and indirect (e.g. through parent companies) investment in cluster munitions.
View on They Vote For You →How each party's members voted
Each bar is 100% of a party's current members in the House of Representatives whom They Vote For You places in one of its seven agreement groups for this policy (its own categories, shown as published). Bars show percentages of members, not vote totals; the number beside each bar is how many members that is. Members They Vote For You says haven't cast enough votes on the policy are counted separately, not in the bars.
- Consistently against
- Almost always against
- Generally against
- Mixture
- Generally for
- Almost always for
- Consistently for
Labor
2 members
Party breakdown as a table (number of members in each group)
| Party | Consistently against | Almost always against | Generally against | Mixture | Generally for | Almost always for | Consistently for | Not enough votes | Members in bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labor | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
All 2 members, by agreement
| Member | Party | Position | Agreement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Thistlethwaite (Kingsford Smith) | Labor | Voted consistently against | 0% |
| Anne Urquhart (Braddon) | Labor | Voted consistently against | 0% |
Votes that make up this policy
The policy position on each vote. Strong votes count more towards a member's agreement score.
- 21 Aug 2012 · SenatePolicy: Aye (strong)Criminal Code Amendment (Cluster Munitions Prohibition) Bill 2010 - In Committee - Ban investment
- 12 May 2011 · SenatePolicy: AyeMotions - Cluster Bombs - Extend prohibitions