Skip to content
Political Tracker

Banning all investment in cluster munitions

People who support this policy believe that the federal government should ban both direct and indirect (e.g. through parent companies) investment in cluster munitions.

View on They Vote For You →

How each party's members voted

Each bar is 100% of a party's current members in the Senate whom They Vote For You places in one of its seven agreement groups for this policy (its own categories, shown as published). Bars show percentages of members, not vote totals; the number beside each bar is how many members that is. Members They Vote For You says haven't cast enough votes on the policy are counted separately, not in the bars.

  • Consistently against
  • Almost always against
  • Generally against
  • Mixture
  • Generally for
  • Almost always for
  • Consistently for
Greens
2 members
Liberal
2 members+1 not enough votes
Labor
2 members+2 not enough votes
Nationals
1 member
Party breakdown as a table (number of members in each group)
PartyConsistently againstAlmost always againstGenerally againstMixtureGenerally forAlmost always forConsistently forNot enough votesMembers in bar
Greens000000202
Liberal200000012
Labor200000022
Nationals100000001
All 10 members, by agreement
MemberPartyPositionAgreement
Sarah Hanson-Young (SA)GreensVoted consistently for100%
Larissa Waters (Queensland)GreensVoted consistently for100%
Helen Polley (Tasmania)LaborNot enough votes to say42%
Glenn Sterle (WA)LaborNot enough votes to say42%
Michaelia Cash (WA)LiberalNot enough votes to say42%
Richard Colbeck (Tasmania)LiberalVoted consistently against2%
Carol Brown (Tasmania)LaborVoted consistently against0%
Bridget McKenzie (Victoria)NationalsVoted consistently against0%
Dean Smith (WA)LiberalVoted consistently against0%
Don Farrell (SA)LaborVoted consistently against0%

Votes that make up this policy

The policy position on each vote. Strong votes count more towards a member's agreement score.